Forums » Off-Topic Discussions

Twilight by Stephenie Meyer and the Movies

    • 5130 posts
    November 22, 2008 2:06 AM PST
    http://www.twilightthemovie.com/ When her mom and new step-dad decide to take to the road and travel to Florida from Arizona, Bella opts to go live with her police chief father in Forks, Washington.  She enrolls in highschool where she is a junior and meets Edward Cullen, vampire, and the chemistry sparks in biology class where they are lab partners.  She's the new kid in school and he is the dark and brooding mysterious one (you get the picture?).  They are drawn together and fall in that frenetic "you are my soulmate" state of affairs rather quickly, but we ARE talking highschool juniors here.  Edward belongs to a clan or family of vampires who have turned from feeding on humans to relying on the blood of wild animals and they live pretty integrated in the local community, though their vampiric nature is not public knowledge.  Bella, however, is brought into the know through her relationship with Edward.  When some renegade vampires come to town, Bella becomes a target for James, the unsavory tracker for the group of bad guy vamps.  And this is where the highpoint of the movie takes place, the chase, the damsel in distress, the hero trying to save the day.... I am a big fan of the vampire/horror movie genre, so when I heard Twilight was in the works I looked forward to opening day.  Its gotten a ton of hype on the web.  I don't watch too much television, so I dont know how saturated that outlet has been with promotional spots. I imagine cast members have been hitting the talk show circuits, though. anyhoo....the story is based on a wildly best-selling book series by Stephanie Meyer ( http://www.stepheniemeyer.com/twilight_movie.html )  I never read the books, but the general story was one I wanted to see.  The movie was directed by Catherine Hardwicke.  She's the one who directed Lords of Dogtown, Thirteen, and The Nativity Story.  Kind of thin on directorial projects.  The screenplay was in the hands of Melissa Rosenberg.  While she seems to have a great deal of experience writing for tv, she only had one other screenplay project to her credit.... 2006's Step Up.  Still, I was not deterred from believing.  Director of photography was a Hardwicke favorite, Elliott Davis.  He was the DP on all three of Hardwick's previous films. (I loved his work on Lords of Dogtown)  And for Twilight, he went for a very moody, gloomy, perpetually dusk blue setting.  It felt more like wintertime in Barrow, Alaska where the sun never shines for the season. Then there's the cast... I won't go all into it, but suffice to say there were no really big names anchoring this ship.  The interesting note here is that the female lead, Bella, is played by Kristen Stewart who also played Jodi Foster's asthmatic diabetic daughter in Panic Room.  Overall, the film had all the right elements, but none of them seemed to connect.  I never once believed any of the over-angsty chemistry between Bella and Edward.  The bad guys weren't bad enough to make me fear for Bella in the slightest.  Minor characters seemed to be too prominent when they didnt serve the story at all in this context.  And, for it being a vampire movie, I don't recall seeing a single fang.  Is that even legal? (maybe I blinked)
    • 3727 posts
    November 22, 2008 3:52 AM PST
    thartley said:
    Is that even legal?
    Sounds like many people are asking that same question. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/39195 IMO They are not vampires, they are something different. ;D Vampires hate the sunlight, do not have reflections, and they have fangs. It is in their blood (pun intended) to be that way. Anything outside of those guidelines is not a vampire. It's something different. Same as calling a bird a bat. It's not, so don't call it that.  And, from what I've just read, the creatures in Twilight have very little in common with vampires. Therefore, don't call them that. My .02 cents. But with the economy like it is, it's only worth .01 cent.
    • 903 posts
    November 22, 2008 2:16 PM PST
    Well, according to the show Supernatural vampires just need human blood and don't age, those being the only real differences between humans and vampires. They had fangs though, to penetrate the skin. Oh and only a silver bullet kills them. New age, new interpretations. James Bond doesn't drink martinis and vampires aren't vampire-like, the world is going crazy.
    • 654 posts
    November 22, 2008 4:25 PM PST
    I have to say something about "panic room", Kristen stewart played a diabetic character not an asthmatic one... I just watched that movie 2 days ago... she had a blood sugar monitor on for the duration of the movie.
    I'm not sure if I will bother to see this movie until it comes out on DVD...i dont really know anyone who would go to a movie of this genre with me and I'm not "dark" enough to go to it on my own.
    • 903 posts
    November 22, 2008 4:27 PM PST
    Maybe thartley knows something you don't. The plot thickens.
    • 5130 posts
    November 23, 2008 6:26 AM PST
    M3R1IN said:
    I have to say something about "panic room", Kristen stewart played a diabetic character not an asthmatic one... I just watched that movie 2 days ago... she had a blood sugar monitor on for the duration of the movie.
    dude, I stand corrected.  Diabetes it is!  :)
    • Moderator
    • 1534 posts
    November 23, 2008 6:58 AM PST
    Thanks for the review thartley! You know your movie stuff.

    I have heard about this book and movie for sometime now with 3 teenagers in the house. You know a movie will have a difficult time critically when the soundtrack gets the most praise by it's intended audience.

    Heck, any movie made from a book is in an uphill battle, I think it is a disadvantage, and most movies made from a book can't use the great storyline to overcome the let down true fans of the book traditionally have.
    • 44 posts
    November 23, 2008 2:01 PM PST
    Sadly, I think the movie was better. In my opinion, I think the book sounded like some crazed fangirl wrote it. It basically read like a fanfiction for some vampire book. Bella wasn't as whiny and she and Edward weren't so clingy in the movie. Oh and it was SO much funnier than the book. :)
    • 1091 posts
    November 24, 2008 5:24 AM PST
    Well, my friend and I think we'll watch it b/c of the actor... ;D
    • Moderator
    • 7059 posts
    November 24, 2008 7:00 AM PST
    Funny vampires with no fangs??? No WaY?!?
    • Moderator
    • 1534 posts
    November 24, 2008 7:45 AM PST
    • 5130 posts
    November 24, 2008 9:22 AM PST
    HA!  Dead and Loving It would get my movie dollars over Twilight anyday.

    I've not read any of the Twilight books, but I wonder how different the dynamics are between Bella and Edwards vs Buffy and Angel, notwithstanding the fact that Buffy is a slayer and Angel a vamp cursed with a soul.  I prefer the over-the-top Buffster and Angelis to the watered down Bella and Edward. 
    • 5130 posts
    December 11, 2008 1:09 PM PST
    I saw this review of Twilight in a free magazine here and couldn't resist posting a snapshot.  Apparently, this is a GREAT movie for 12-yr old girls.  ;D ;D
    • 131 posts
    December 12, 2008 12:40 AM PST
    Hahahah! I saw Twilight with my mom last Sunday and I am still saying "ohhh wow" at all the giggling we heard throughout the movie! We even heard one girl give a big "whhooo!!" during to scene when they first kissed, hahaha.  Like the review says, good for 12 yr old girls.
    ;)
    • Moderator
    • 7059 posts
    December 12, 2008 5:35 AM PST
    This was assigned reading for the school I've been subbing at for some of the English classes. I think Terri is must be a 12 year old giggly girl trapped in a *cough* mature body. ;D
    • 15 posts
    December 12, 2008 10:30 AM PST
    I read all four books in three days and really thought they were pretty good...no Harry Potter but I enjoyed them thoroughly. I have no intention of seeing the movie though. From all I have heard about it I would rather keep the pictures I have in my head.
    • 1091 posts
    December 13, 2008 4:31 AM PST
    thartley said:
    I saw this review of Twilight in a free magazine here and couldn't resist posting a snapshot.  Apparently, this is a GREAT movie for 12-yr old girls.  ;D ;D
    hahaha Yes, Terri. PK, Nok, Sam, Wave and I we went to see it already. Pk said this is a very girl movie. No any comment about how good movie is but I can't stop thinking about Edward ;D ;D (most of the ticket had sold to girls :D :D)
    • 3727 posts
    December 13, 2008 5:53 AM PST
    Since Ming saw that movie she has been comparing every mistake I make to what Edward would do. If I leave dirty dishes out she'll say, "Edward wouldn't do that!"  If I give her a dozen roses, she'll say, "Edward would give me TWO dozen. And he would carry me high into the trees!"

    They should just call the sequel, "What Would Edward Do". ;D
    • 5130 posts
    December 13, 2008 6:05 AM PST

    • Moderator
    • 7059 posts
    December 13, 2008 6:29 AM PST
    LoL! There is a lot of Twilight Flair on Facebook. I should look for one that says "Real Vampires have fangs!" :D
    • 5130 posts
    December 13, 2008 9:41 AM PST
    Or..."Real Men Sparkle"  I think he needs a blouse shirt that says that.  ;D
    • 1 posts
    December 14, 2008 3:27 PM PST
    i want to see this movie so badly! i love edward!
    • 1091 posts
    December 14, 2008 6:13 PM PST
    It doesn't need to be a good story. I think just make the movie name "Edward" then sell the ticket to all the girls. :D :D
    • 5130 posts
    • 1091 posts
    December 17, 2008 7:20 AM PST
    Really!!  :o :o  Edward #II :o :o

    Terri : I know how surprised you are.  :D :D :D